Watching the Daytona 500 today I was reminded that I came across an article not so long ago on social cooperation and how the groups of cars work cooperatively (drafting one another) in order to gain an advantage during the race. In fact, they will work together for long periods of time until the last couple of laps (sometimes until the very end) in order to ensure that they keep their advantage. This article by David Ronfeldt says it very well:
This provides a curious laboratory for several social science theories: (1) complexity theory, since the racers self-organize into structures that oscillate between order and chaos; (2) social network analysis, since draft lines are line networks whose organization depends on a driver's social capital as well as his human capital; and (3) game theory, since racers face a "prisoner's dilemma" in seeking drafting partners who will not defect and leave them stranded.
Of course, it gets even more complex when one throws personalities in and the results of past races. Unlike the IROC series, these drivers have contact with the pits and so negotiations can go on between pit crews as well as implicitly between the drivers.
Posted by artandscience at February 15, 2004 04:59 PMfrom equine dentistry to NASCAR, as seen through the eyes of a social scientist, you have a small-c catholic range of interests.
Posted by: paul at February 15, 2004 10:03 PMWhy, thank you for the compliment! You should see the list of posts I haven't had time to research and write..
Posted by: stefan at February 16, 2004 05:12 PM